<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <link>http://mikewatkins.ca/tags/canada/</link>
  <atom:link href="http://mikewatkins.ca/tags/canada/feeds/rss" type="application/rss+xml" rel="self"/>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 07:46:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <title>mike watkins dot ca</title>
  <description>XML Feed for mike watkins dot ca</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <generator>Parlez/0.1</generator>
<item>
  <title>Prentice: Drill Baby Drill</title>
  <link>http://mikewatkins.ca/2010/05/07/prentice-drill-baby-drill/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
<div class="document">
<p>Federal Environment Minister Jim Prentice wants to turn our beautiful, abundantly productive, west coast from this:</p>
<img alt="http://mikewatkins.ca/2010/05/07/prentice-drill-baby-drill/file/6f14cf7cf0b0/pristine-coast.gif" src="http://mikewatkins.ca/2010/05/07/prentice-drill-baby-drill/file/6f14cf7cf0b0/pristine-coast.gif" />
<p>... into this:</p>
<img alt="http://mikewatkins.ca/2010/05/07/prentice-drill-baby-drill/file/2201688b8dee/oil-spill-bp-horizon-04-2010.gif" src="http://mikewatkins.ca/2010/05/07/prentice-drill-baby-drill/file/2201688b8dee/oil-spill-bp-horizon-04-2010.gif" />
<p>... or this:</p>
<img alt="http://mikewatkins.ca/2010/05/07/prentice-drill-baby-drill/file/29b3e652cf11/oil-spill-exxon.gif" src="http://mikewatkins.ca/2010/05/07/prentice-drill-baby-drill/file/29b3e652cf11/oil-spill-exxon.gif" />
<p>Globe and Mail, Friday May 6 2010 -- <a class="reference external" href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/prentice-sees-no-need-for-drilling-moratorium/article1559542/?cmpid=rss1">Environment Minister Jim Prentice says there is no need for a moratorium on future offshore drilling in Canadian waters while the world tries to figure out what went wrong in the Gulf of Mexico.</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>The spill of thousands of barrels of crude a day into the Gulf, and the environmental devastation that now threatens the Louisiana shore, have prompted other governments to put future drilling on hold, even if it could mean higher energy prices.</p>
<p><strong>California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has issued a moratorium on future oil drilling permits</strong> off the state's coast until it can be determined that a disaster similar to the one in the Gulf of Mexico can be avoided. [And U.S. President Barak Obama has put new drilling in the Gulf of Mexico on hold as well.]</p>
<p>But Mr. Prentice sees no need to follow the example set south of the border.</p>
<p>&quot;I don't think the answer is a moratorium,&quot;the minister told reporters on Thursday. &quot;We are all appalled by what we are seeing in the Gulf of Mexico. Everyone is worried about that. Here in Canada, we've not had those kinds of incidents and that's because of the strong regulatory environment that we have had with the National Energy Board (NEB).&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Canada hasn't had the sorts of incidents the U.S. and other nations has had only because our offshore oil industry is tiny by comparison. When you increase the rig count and number of areas being exploited, and increase the outbound tanker traffic, the probability of a serious accident increases as well.</p>
<p>The U.S. takes its coastal environment very seriously. If they can't get it right, 100% of the time, then how are we - relatively green to offshore oil and gas production - to be expected to get it right, 100% of the time?</p>
<p>Minister Prentice ought to know that Canada has quite enough environmental disasters on land, and our track record of managing our oceans is far from laudable. We should not sell out our coast for a fistful of dollars.</p>
</div>

]]></description>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:mikewatkins.ca,2007-10-10:journal:mw:entry:770</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 07:46:52 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>bc</category>
  <category>canada</category>
  <category>disaster</category>
  <category>energy</category>
  <category>environment</category>
</item>
<item>
  <title>OECD: Canada healthcare as good as U.S.</title>
  <link>http://mikewatkins.ca/2009/09/20/oecd-canada-healthcare-as-good-as-us/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
<div class="document">
<p>A recent report from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development cuts through the right-wing rhetoric boiling the U.S. healthcare debate and destroys the notion that Canadian healthcare is inferior to that found in the U.S.</p>
<p>Our costs are lower - 47% lower - and our outcomes are equal or better. We live two or three years longer than our U.S. neighbours. Contained costs and as good or better outcomes - these are indicators the U.S. should be looking at, not the propaganda being flouted shamelessly by healthcare reform detractors.  From Bloomberg: <a class="reference external" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&amp;sid=a_zs1Y1FspIM">Canadian Health Care, Even With Queues, Bests U.S.</a></p>
<blockquote>
&quot;The real difference has been [Canada's] ability to control technology costs,&quot; said Anderson, who directed reviews of health systems for the World Bank and developed U.S. Medicare payment guidelines for the Health and Human Services Department. &quot;The only thing the U.S. is consistently No. 1 in when it comes to international comparisons with Canada and other OECD countries is cost.&quot;</blockquote>
</div>

]]></description>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:mikewatkins.ca,2007-10-10:journal:mw:entry:723</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:11:13 GMT</pubDate>
  <category>canada</category>
  <category>health</category>
  <category>politics</category>
  <category>us</category>
</item>
</channel></rss>