mike watkins dot ca : September 6 2008 Archives

September 06 2008

Damage Control: Not so fast Emerson

Wrapping up coverage on duplicitous David Emerson may take a while since each time we shake the closets for remaining skeletons they keep falling out left and right.

Emerson: I never was a Liberal

Friday on CBC Radio's popular morning show The Early Edition as a parting question host Rick Cluff asked Emerson if he had any regrets. Emerson responded that he'd been a bit too partisan in the latter stage of the campaign.

One can understand why Emerson would say such a thing, since he's been trying in vain to portray himself as above partisanship, even as he continues to engage in partisanship.

On Cluff's show Emerson declared "I never was a Liberal".

Yet Emerson was twice elected as a Liberal having twice ran very partisan campaigns. In the 2006 election he used fear tactics claiming Harper had a right-wing agenda to slash social programs, and in his election night victory speech he vowed to become Stephen Harper's worst nightmare.

On election night 2006:

“We have got to look at this as Ground Zero for rebuilding a stronger, more vibrant, healthier, winning Liberal Party.” David Emerson

During Election 2006:

"It's now not just, 'Can Stephen Harper mount a credible campaign?' It's people now having to decide, 'Can we really live with what Stephen Harper will deliver?'

"And I have to tell you, I have never seen a right-wing government in all of my life, and I've been in government or near government for 32 years, I have never seen a Conservative government that didn't come in, in the first year or two and slash social programs, raise taxes and create an awful lot of havoc that they did not disclose before the election." (CBC News, February 6 2006)

Yet Emerson was not acting in a partisan manner only during Election 2006. Two years earlier during Election 2004:

“Either they’re going to take us into a big Mulroney debt or they will be slashing social programs,” said Emerson. “I’ve heard right-wing governments say for years they were going to save money by reducing inefficiency,” he said. “It’s a bunch of horsefeathers. It doesn’t happen. If you don’t cut programs, you don’t reduce expenses.” (Vancouver Sun, June 5, 2004)

In 2004 while addressing a convention of B.C. federal Liberals Emerson said:

They [British Columbians] have a sense of compassion for those in society who are vulnerable, through circumstances out of their control. British Columbians do not want people left behind. They believe in equality – equality of opportunity, equality of treatment, equality under the law… they believe in social justice. These are widely held beliefs, here in BC, and across Canada. I’m an optimistic Liberal because those are my beliefs. And I am Liberal because those are Liberal beliefs.

Restating the obvious, Emerson ran as a Liberal twice, was a sitting Liberal cabinet minister in the last election, and during both elections he played the partisan game as well as any other candidate. He warned Vancouver-Kingsway residents that Conservatives would destroy social programs and that Harper harbours a secret agenda. He said what people intuitively felt and what the Liberal party was promoting as a result was re-elected due to the partisan campaign he ran and the center-left leanings of this riding.

For Emerson to claim that he wasn't acting fully the role of a partisan Liberal is to revise history in a manner which is beyond the pale. Emerson has played the partisan Liberal role throughout his entire career as a Liberal politician, not merely during the final days of Election 2006 as he claimed on Friday. And now in his final act of self-preservation and image-rebuilding he's playing the Conservative partisan role to the hilt.

The man simply can't speak honestly.

A hat tip to A BCer in Toronto for the link to Emerson's 2004 speech, a copy of which is attached here in PDF form for your convenience. Have a read and see just how partisan Emerson was:

Emerson Media Watch

Some new and catch up items:

Warren Kinsella's Clear Canadian Campaign Coverage (Sept. 6, 2008)

LOSER: Political polygamist David Emerson, who now wants us all to know he was never a Liberal. What we know, instead, that David Emerson represents the worst of politics: the man who, in his essence, believes in nothing. The reason he isn't running again is simple - he'd get massacred in Vancouver-Kingsway. Don't let the screen door hit you on your way out, Dave.

Critics find David Emerson's foreign-affairs role ironic (July 10 2008, The Georgia Straight)

“I hope [David Emerson] runs again so I can kick his ass,” [former Campaign to De-Elect Kevin Chalmers] said by phone after stepping off a plane from Toronto. “Given the lack of depth in the bench strength there, I can understand why the prime minister would go to him [to replace Maxime Bernier]. On the other hand, it is ironic that when you look at him being in that role—and trying to take Canadian values and democracy and looking at Kosovo or China or what has gone on recently in the world—you wonder, how can this person be an advocate or a voice for democracy under the circumstances?”

David Emerson, 'son-in-law of China' (July 2 2008, The Globe and Mail)

“Analysts think that Emerson's appointment as foreign minister might bring an improvement in relations between Canada and China,” the Global Times added. “He is expected to reduce the ideological differences between Canada and China…. He is the Canadian minister who is most familiar with Chinese issues, and the one who has visited China the most times.”

[Editor: Ideological differences indeed - neither China nor David Emerson believe in real democracy]