Islam Is a Faith of Reason

Recently HH Aga Khan was interviewed by CBC‘s Peter Mansbridge for his “One on One” show. Its a compelling look inside the very intelligent mind of the leader of one of the smaller sects of Shia Islam. From an equally interesting interview in Germany’s Spiegle Magazine (in english) with Ismaili leader HH Aga Khan IV:

SPIEGEL: Most of your Ismaili constituency lives in states that cannot be called perfect democracies: Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria and Iran. What makes democracies fail?

Aga Khan: I ask myself every day what we can do to sustain the multiple forms of democracy, to make these forms of government work, whether it is in Latin America, Africa or the Middle East.

SPIEGEL: And what do you believe to be the answer?

Aga Khan: I admit that I live in a mood of frustration. What is the point in these areas of the world of carrying out a referendum in a population that essentially cannot read and write? What is the point in testing a constitution with a population that knows no difference between a presidential regime or a constitutional monarchy? Elections, constitutions—all this is necessary, but not sufficient. I think we have to accept that countries have different histories, different social structures, different needs, so we have to be a great deal more flexible than we have been.

On Iraq:

Aga Khan: I am very, very worried about Iraq. The invasion of Iraq had an impact across the world like nothing before in modern times. The invasion has unleashed every force in the Islamic world, including the relations between the Arabs and non-Arabs and the relationship between the Shia und the Sunni.

SPIEGEL: You mean the war created a new terrorist base and radicalized people?

Aga Khan: Indeed. It mobilized a large number of people across the Islamic world, who before then were not involved, and indeed I think they did not want to be.

SPIEGEL: Do you share the view of the American professor and Islam expert Vali Nasr that the balance of power in the Muslim world is undergoing a decisive shift, that Shiites could become the most influential force from Baghdad to Beirut, that the future of the Middle East will be shaped by wars between different Muslim factions?

Aga Khan: When the invasion of Iraq took place, we were told two things: (that there would be) regime change and democracy. Well, anyone who knew the situation in Iraq, as you did, I did, but what did that mean? That meant a Shia majority; it could not have been otherwise. Anyone who then concludes that the next issue is a Shia majority in Iraq is going to start thinking, What does that mean in the region, what does it mean in the Islamic world, what does it mean in relation to the West? All that was as clear as daylight, you didn’t even have to be a Muslim or a scholar to know that.

Perhaps my favorite exchange:

SPIEGEL: “The West (will stand) against the Rest” wrote Professor Samuel Huntington in his famous book “Clash of Civilizations.” Is such a conflict, such a clash inevitable?

Aga Khan: I prefer to talk about a clash of ignorance. There is so much horrible, damaging, dangerous ignorance.

Unlock the Legislature, Gordon

The chilling story of the privatisation of B.C. Hydro continues, this time via the back door as B.C. Hydro, with the blessing of Gordon Campbell – in secret, with a locked Legislature offering no opportunity for public debate – is set to sign contracts which will commit B.C. taxpayers to forking out $15.6 billion to independent and foreign power companies.

The scope of the deal is such that over 8% of B.C.‘s power produced must be bought, at much higher prices, from these private power producers.

Looking at this another way, the signing of these contracts will mean that Campbell has been successful in privatising another 8% of B.C. Hydro, and power consumers will be on the hook for costs more than double the market rate.

The rational for this change is hard to fathom. The old policy worked very well. By generating its own power, B.C. Hydro ensured that ratepayers enjoyed, on average, the second lowest electricity prices in North America. This is because prices were based on the historic cost of production, not the current energy market price. At the same time, B.C. Hydro contributed about three quarters of a billion dollars, annually, to the provincial government from dividends, water rentals and taxes in lieu.

Under the new plan, B.C. Hydro has to buy virtually all its future electrical energy from private power developers. To do this B.C. Hydro has to enter legally binding contracts—called Energy Purchase Agreements—with private energy corporations. The agreements lock B.C. Hydro (and B.C. taxpayers) into financial commitments of up to 40 years. John Calvert, former member of the province’s Integrated Electricity Planning, member of the board of Citizens For Public Power, writes in The Tyee BC Hydro’s Amazingly Bad Deal for Taxpayers

If this were actually a democracy we lived in, such a radical move to dismantle a key public trust would justify calling an election. Instead Campbell gets to lock the legislature (because there is no rule preventing him) and stick it out in government, despite that issues of the day properly demand that he seek a mandate from the people (because he adopted fixed election dates).

This is one reason why I do not support fixed election dates. They sound good on the surface, but real conservatives know that change of long-standing traditions often comes with hidden price tags.

Come on Gordon, be a man, be a democrat, reveal the contract details, and unlock the legislature so members can debate these radical changes B.C. Hydro is making. Changes no one in B.C. voted for.